Is XRP dead, a scam, or a failed experiment?
Also asked as: “Is XRP dead, or does it still have a future?” · “Is XRP a scam?” · “Is institutional XRP vaporware, or a failed crypto experiment?” · “Is XRP's growth just marketing?”
Confirmed Published 5 min read
Short answer
The court and regulator records reviewed for this page contain no fraud finding about XRP, and the ledger is running: xrpscan’s amendment data showed 35 validations on September 29, 2026. A court ruled in July 2023 that XRP itself is not an investment contract, though Ripple’s direct sales to institutions broke registration rules. The stronger criticism concerns value capture.
The full answer
“Dead”, “scam” and “failed experiment” are three different charges. Each can be checked against records: what courts and regulators decided, whether the ledger is running, and whether anyone with reporting duties holds XRP. The strongest criticism that survives those checks is narrower, and it is about value.
What have courts and regulators said about XRP?
On December 22, 2020, the SEC sued Ripple and two executives, alleging that they raised over $1.3 billion through “an unregistered, ongoing digital asset securities offering.”[1] The court later described the SEC’s claims as violations of Section 5 of the Securities Act, the registration requirement, and aiding and abetting those violations.[2] Fraud was not among the claims the court described.
On July 13, 2023, Judge Analisa Torres held that “XRP, as a digital token, is not in and of itself” an investment contract. She also held that Ripple’s direct sales to institutions, about $728.9 million by the SEC’s count, were unregistered sales of investment contracts, and that its sales on exchanges were not.[2] The court’s final judgment imposed a $125,035,150 civil penalty on Ripple and an injunction against violating the registration rules, according to the SEC.[4] The remedies ruling of August 7, 2024 also denied the SEC’s request for disgorgement, according to the copy on Justia, whose wording could not be checked word for word.[3] Both sides dropped their appeals on August 7, 2025, which ended the case with that judgment in place.[4] Whether XRP is a security today is covered on is XRP a security.
An SEC interpretive release that took effect on March 23, 2026 lists XRP among its examples of digital commodities and says a digital commodity “is not a security.” The same release says a non-security crypto asset “can be offered and sold subject to an investment contract, which is a security.”[5]
What is the strongest case against Ripple in those records?
The critics’ best evidence comes from the same records. The court found that institutional buyers “reasonably expected that Ripple would use the capital it received from its sales to improve the XRP ecosystem and thereby increase the price of XRP.”[2] The court set that against buyers on exchanges, who “could not reasonably expect the same.”[2] Earlier, on May 5, 2015, FinCEN fined Ripple Labs $700,000. It said Ripple Labs “willfully violated” the Bank Secrecy Act by selling XRP without registering as a money services business and by failing to keep an adequate anti-money-laundering program. In a parallel settlement with federal prosecutors, Ripple Labs and its subsidiary XRP II “resolved possible criminal charges and forfeited $450,000,” which was credited toward FinCEN’s penalty.[6]
These records show rule-breaking by the company, including what FinCEN called a willful violation of the Bank Secrecy Act. None of the records reviewed for this page is a finding that XRP holders were deceived.
Is the XRP Ledger still running?
On September 29, 2026, the explorer xrpscan’s amendment data showed 35 validations on pending ledger upgrades.[12] XRPL.org’s home page claims “14 Years + Continuous uptime” and “8M + Funded accounts.”[7] The uptime claim is XRPL.org’s own wording. Decrypt reported that on February 4, 2025 the ledger stopped confirming new ledgers for about an hour; Ripple CTO David Schwartz, as Decrypt identified him, said validations “were not being published,” and Decrypt reported no loss of assets.[8] This rests on Decrypt’s reporting alone, since XRPL.org had published no incident report on the halt as of September 29, 2026. Whether use of the ledger is rising or falling is tracked on is XRP Ledger usage growing.
At least one fund that files reports with the SEC reported holding XRP: Bitwise XRP ETF’s quarterly report gives a net closing balance of 286,838,445.9126 XRP at June 30, 2026.[9] The wider set of institutional developments since the case is on XRP’s institutional position since the SEC case. The allaboutxrp partnerships page lists institution-level evidence of direct XRP use: for SBI Remit, Ripple explicitly states that the flow leverages XRP (Ripple, July 2021), and Ripple identified Cuallix as the first institution to use xRapid and XRP (Ripple, October 2017). For Bitso, it says a current Ripple customer case study names both RLUSD and XRP as settlement assets.
What is the serious bear case, then?
The serious bear case is about value capture. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. on August 13, 2026, Sam Daodu argued that “Ripple closed ten major deals in 2026 and not one of them settled in XRP.”[10] The same piece grants that “XRP still has a job in the routes stablecoins cannot reach.”[10] The 24/7 Wall St. page could not be fetched for a word-for-word check of these quotes as of September 29, 2026, and the ten-deal count is the author’s own.
Ripple’s CEO has said something close to both halves. In a January 22, 2026 interview reported by crypto.news, Brad Garlinghouse called XRP “the best bridge asset” for some payments and said that for others “a stablecoin is going to solve that problem better.”[11] Taken together, the two sources suggest that if Ripple’s products grow mostly through stablecoins, Ripple can succeed while demand for XRP grows less. The allaboutxrp partnerships page says there is no complete public list proving that every Ripple banking customer uses XRP, and that Ripple products can use fiat, stablecoins, XRP, or custody infrastructure. That argument is set out in full on XRP’s value-capture problem, and the reasons many in crypto dislike XRP are on why crypto critics dislike XRP.
What evidence would show XRP genuinely failing?
These are the signals that would count, each checkable in a primary record. The ledger stopping for long periods, or trusted validators leaving the default lists faster than they are replaced, would show up in validator data. Regulated funds reporting falling XRP holdings quarter after quarter would show up in their SEC filings. A court or the SEC withdrawing the positions above would show up in the case docket or the Federal Register. Ripple saying its payment flows no longer use XRP at all would show up in Ripple’s own releases.
On September 29, 2026, validators were voting and the SEC’s 2026 release was in effect. The trend in fund holdings and Ripple’s mix of payment assets are not known, since neither was measured here. None of this says whether XRP suits any one person; that question is covered on the evidence on holding XRP long term, and how the different kinds of risk split is on the kinds of XRP risk.
What we know
- May 5, 2015: FinCEN fined Ripple Labs $700,000 for selling XRP without registering as a money services business; in a parallel settlement with federal prosecutors, Ripple resolved possible criminal charges and forfeited $450,000, credited toward the fine.
- December 22, 2020: the SEC sued Ripple and two executives, alleging an unregistered securities offering of over $1.3 billion.
- July 13, 2023: the court held XRP is not in itself an investment contract; Ripple’s institutional sales were unregistered securities sales; its exchange sales were not.
- August 7, 2024: remedies ruling (the date comes from the Justia copy of the ruling, whose wording could not be checked word for word). The SEC describes the final judgment as a $125,035,150 penalty and an injunction; the Justia copy also records disgorgement denied.
- August 7, 2025: appeals dismissed, ending the case.
- February 4, 2025: Decrypt reported that the ledger stopped confirming ledgers for about an hour (Decrypt, February 5, 2025).
- March 23, 2026: an SEC interpretive release took effect naming XRP as an example of a digital commodity.
- June 30, 2026: Bitwise XRP ETF held 286,838,445.9126 XRP (Form 10-Q).
- September 29, 2026: xrpscan’s amendment data showed 35 validations on pending ledger upgrades.
What we reason Analysis
- A scam usually means deception for gain. The court described the SEC’s claims as registration violations and aiding and abetting them, and fraud was not among them; the violations FinCEN described in 2015 were registration, anti-money-laundering and reporting failures. This follows from the July 13, 2023 opinion and FinCEN’s May 5, 2015 release.
- The ledger is operating: validators were voting on upgrades on September 29, 2026, and a regulated fund reported holding XRP at June 30, 2026. This follows from xrpscan data and the Bitwise 10-Q.
- The serious open question is value capture, not whether XRP works. This follows from the 24/7 Wall St. argument and Ripple’s CEO’s own January 2026 remarks.
What's still open
- Whether Ripple’s payment products will route more or less volume through XRP relative to stablecoins: no Ripple figure splitting settlement by asset for 2026 was found as of September 29, 2026 (searched Ripple’s press pages and XRP page).
- XRPL.org has not published an incident report on the February 2025 halt that was found in this run (searched XRPL.org blog, September 29, 2026).
In plain English
People call XRP a scam for different reasons, so this page checks what courts and regulators actually decided. A US court found that some of Ripple’s past sales broke the rules for selling investments, but it did not find that XRP itself was an investment, and the case was about the registration rules for selling investments, not fraud. The network behind XRP is still running, and at least one US fund reported holding XRP for its investors as of June 30, 2026. The harder question, still open, is whether more use of Ripple’s products means more demand for XRP.
Key terms
Sources
- SEC Charges Ripple and Two Executives with Conducting $1.3 Billion Unregistered Securities Offering — US Securities and Exchange Commission, December 22, 2020 Primary
- Opinion and Order, SEC v. Ripple Labs, Inc., No. 20 Civ. 10832 (AT) — US District Court, Southern District of New York, July 13, 2023 Primary
- SEC v. Ripple Labs Inc., Document 973 (final judgment ruling) — US District Court, Southern District of New York (via Justia), August 7, 2024 Primary
- Litigation Release No. 26369 — US Securities and Exchange Commission, August 7, 2025 Primary
- Application of the Federal Securities Laws to Certain Types of Crypto Assets (Release Nos. 33-11412; 34-105020) — US Securities and Exchange Commission, effective March 23, 2026 Primary
- FinCEN Fines Ripple Labs Inc. in First Civil Enforcement Action Against a Virtual Currency Exchanger — Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), May 5, 2015 Primary
- XRPL.org home page — XRPL.org, checked September 29, 2026 Company-reported
- XRP Ledger Temporarily Halts Block Production, Ripple CTO Cites Possible Network 'Drift' — Decrypt, February 5, 2025 Secondary
- Bitwise XRP ETF, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 — Bitwise XRP ETF (SEC EDGAR), 2026 Primary
- Are Stablecoins Making XRP Unnecessary? — 24/7 Wall St. (Sam Daodu), August 13, 2026 Secondary
- XRP could lose some payment flows to stablecoins, Ripple CEO says — crypto.news, September 25, 2026 Secondary
- Amendments data — xrpscan, September 29, 2026 Secondary
- Upcoming Devnet Reset — XRPL.org, January 24, 2025 Primary
Update log
- — Published.
I keep this site free, with no ads, paywall or affiliate links; gifts cover hosting and research time. Support the project, or report an error.
